senator larry craig, who was working with mitt on his campaign, elected to drop out of the romney camp so as not to distract.
so...... that was nice of him. i mean - we'd hate to have him come up in the romney campaign, right?
but wait...that didn't stop mitt from bringing him up anyway:
"it reminds us that people who are elected to public office continue to disappoint," mitty said on cnbc. "and they somehow think that if they vote the right way on issues of significance or they can speak a good game that we'll just forgive and forget."
oh, you mean....the way you want everyone to forget that you ran as a democrat to get elected as governor of massachusetts?
or the way you want the republicans to forgive you for years of being a social progressive? forget the way you supported abortion rights?
you want everyone to forget and forgive all that... so you can now run as a republican for president of the united states?
is that what you mean by speaking a good game?
so tell me, mitt: who are you currently disappointing? the dems that voted you into office because you supported their views at the time it best benefited you? or the republicans that have to listen to you constantly flip-flop on every important issue you've run on so that you can now steal the GOP nomination from a true conservative?
and have you disappointed senator craig? a loyal campaigner who made a pro-romney video that has now been ripped off of youtube...? that dropped out of your campaign so as not to hurt your chances due to association? the man you have now vilified in the public's eyes?
i'm not defending senator craig.... i mean, the 'mo needs to own up to actions. remember that he was the one that said back in february of '99 that "clinton brought this nation to this point because of his own self-gratification, setting what was good for himself above what was good for the nation." (glass houses.......)
but mitt.... seriously?
meet the press quote of the week
way over due, i know.... and i apologize, my lovelies. this week's quote comes from thomas ricks of the washington post:
"iraq, i think, is going to be much more difficult for this country than the vietnam war was...because we could walk away from vietnam." ricks goes on to say that leaving vietman was bad for the cambodians and others (obviously) but it didn't result in the predicted domino effect of communism taking over the world. but that we've "stepped into something" with iraq which is in a region with too high an economic influence on the world to just leave it.
i.e. i think we're in it for the long haul.....
e.
No comments:
Post a Comment